农业部作弊、云无心造谣、孟山都赚钱。
附件：孟山都公司提供的RR2获准证书。 美国的种子没有美国当局的证书；在巴西阿根廷等种植国家，亮出的证书不是本国当局的，而都是中国农业部颁发的、且中国农业部证书并非完整（许多空白）甚至没有审核批准官员的签字；而 中国农业部使用的巴西证书的有效期是“无”。在答复中国公民查询的时候，中国农业部说该品种评估文件信息“不存在”。那不是很诡秘的么？  附件：巴西官方评估机构为RR2颁发了证书、但其成员医生们表示反对RR2商业化及其理由的原文。 这例子足以说明，有批准和有证书的转基因食品作物并非就是安全的，至少，当事国巴西官方评审机构的医生就提出了不少安全性质疑问题。这是否就是该证书的有效期是‘无’、即有证书却没生效的缘故？没看到美国和巴西方面的官方解释说明；鉴于巴西官方审核机构医生成员反对商业化，美国官方也不好做什么评价吧，更谈不上松鼠云无心者所谓的“认为足够”了。不管怎样，中国农业部审批的外国官方依据是个实际上没生效的依据，其审批是否合法合格和是否涉嫌作弊，那还用多问么？ 相关文字原文如下： Technical Opinion no. 2542/2010 - Commercial release of genetically modified insect-resistant and herbicide-tolerant soy containing genetically modified events MON 87701 and MON 89788 Technical Opinion no. 2542/2010 连接：http://www.ctnbio.gov.br/index.php/content/view/15558.html Dissenting Votes: CTNBio members Doctor Pedro Canísio Binsfeld， Doctor Paulo Kageyama， Doctor Leonardo Melgarejo， Doctor Solange Telles da Silva， Doctor Graziela Almeida da Silva and Doctor Luiza Chomenko voted against commercial release of MON 87701 x MON 89788 soy. Doctor Melgarejo justifies his vote by claiming that some studies required by Ruling Resolution n? 5， including pregnant animals and multigenerational studies were not conducted. Doctor Solange Telles justifies her vote by claiming that the post-commercial release monitoring plan had not been previously passed. Doctor Luiza Chomenko justifies her vote by claiming that the post-commercial release monitoring plan had not been previously passed and that during the discussion on the proceedings a series of issues were raised about CTNBio procedures. Abstentions: There were no abstentions. 截图：  # # # 我的更多文章 智库无智，囊中白痴。 韩先生是谁的部长？ 黄金大米还在骗。 胎停罪魁（答小崔读友）。 美国农业部：我没招了，您看着办吧。 |
手机版|小黑屋|Archiver|中国琉球网 ( 闽ICP备13003013号 )
GMT+8, 2024-4-29 21:18 , Processed in 1.232396 second(s), 11 queries , File On.
Powered by Discuz! X3.4
© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.
