转基因玉米致老鼠肿瘤铁证如山！
The study found severe liver andkidney damage and hormonal disturbances in rats fed the GM maizeand low levels of Roundup that are below those permitted indrinking water in the EU. Toxic effects were found from the GMmaize tested alone, as well as from Roundup tested alone andtogether with the maize. Additional unexpected findings were higherrates of large tumours and mortality in most treatmentgroups. 该项研究在喂养转基因玉米与地域欧盟饮用水允许微量水平的草甘膦除草剂农达的老鼠中发现严重的肝脏与肾脏损伤以及激素干扰。单独喂养转基因玉米（种植过程不喷洒草甘膦除草剂因而不含草甘膦残留的转基因玉米－－译注）的老鼠、仅喂食低微量草甘膦除草剂农达的老鼠，以及喂养含草甘膦残留的转基因玉米（种植过程喷洒草甘膦除草剂因而含草甘膦残留的转基因玉米－－译注）的老鼠，都发现了毒性作用。除此之外，在大部分处理组中，还发现了未曾预料的高比例大肿瘤与死亡率。 The study was first published in Foodand Chemical Toxicology (FCT) in September 2012[1] but wasretracted by the editor-in-chief in November 2013 after a sustainedcampaign of criticism and defamation by pro-GMOscientists.[2] 该项研究2012年9月首先发表在《食品与化学毒理学》（FCT）[1]，但是在力挺转基因的一批科学家发动的持续抨击与诽谤运动后2013年11月遭刊物总编撤稿。[2] Now the study has been republished byEnvironmental Sciences Europe. The republished version containsextra material addressing criticisms of the original publication.The raw data underlying the study’s findings are also published –unlike the raw data for the industry studies that underlieregulatory approvals of Roundup, which are kept secret. However,the new paper presents the same results as before and theconclusions are unchanged. 现在，该项研究由《欧洲环境科学》再次出版。再版的论文包含一些额外的资料来对付对初版论文的批评。作为该项研究基础的原始数据也发表出来--不像产业界为草甘膦除草剂农达获得监管机构批准的试验资料一直保密拒绝公布。然而，再版的新论文提出的结果与以前相同，论文结论也没有改变。 The republished study is accompaniedby a separate commentary by Prof Séralini’s team describing thelobbying efforts of GMO crop supporters to force the editor of FCTto retract the original publication. 研究论文重新发表时，还一起发表塞拉利尼教授团队的一篇评论文章，描述转基因作物支持者的游说努力迫使《食品化学毒理学》杂志总编撤除该篇论文的情况。 GMOSeralini.org editor ClaireRobinson commented: “This study has now successfully passed no lessthan three rounds of rigorous peer review. GMOSeralini.org 网站编辑克莱尔·罗宾森评论：“该项研究目前成功通过了不少于三轮严格的同行专家审查。 “The first was for the initialpublication of the study in Food and Chemical Toxicology. It passedwith only minor revisions, according to theauthors.[3] “首次在《食品与化学毒理学》上发表时，它通过了同行审查，只做了很少的修改，论文作者说。[3] |
手机版|小黑屋|Archiver|中国琉球网 ( 闽ICP备13003013号 )
GMT+8, 2024-5-6 16:17 , Processed in 1.574063 second(s), 11 queries , File On.
Powered by Discuz! X3.4
© 2001-2023 Discuz! Team.
