转基因玉米致老鼠肿瘤铁证如山！

2015-9-18 10:11| 发布者: 风在手| 查看: 4446| 评论: 3|原作者: 风在手

摘要: 美国孟山都不得不进行围剿，策动发表塞拉利尼论文的杂志撤消了塞拉利尼的论文，因而引起世界数百科学家的抗议。一年后，塞拉利尼的论文再次公开发表。中国媒体报道了塞拉利尼被撤稿的消息，但是却封锁了塞拉利尼论文 ...

转基因玉米致老鼠肿瘤铁证如山！

Dr Jack A Heinemann, Professor ofMolecular Biology and Genetics, University of Canterbury NewZealand, called the republication “an important demonstration ofthe resilience of the scientific community”. Dr Heinemanncontinued, “The first publication of these results revealed some ofthe viciousness that can be unleashed on researchers presentinguncomfortable findings. I applaud Environmental Sciences Europe forsubmitting the work to yet another round of rigorous blind peerreview and then bravely standing by the process and therecommendations of its reviewers, especially after witnessing theevents surrounding the first publication.

杰克·A·海尼曼博士，新西兰大学堪培拉大学分子生物学与遗传性教授，称该研究论文的重新发表“科学界韧性的重要演示”。海尼曼博士继续说，“第一次发表这些结果显示出研究人员提出某些不舒服结果时可能披露某些邪恶情况。我我赞赏《欧洲环境科学》经过又一轮严格的匿名同行评审后再次提交这篇研究论文，然后勇敢的坚持科学的程序与审查们推荐的意见，特别在见证了首次发表后发生的一系列事件后这样做。

“This study has arguably prevailedthrough the most comprehensive and independent review process towhich any scientific study on GMOs has ever beensubjected.

“这项研究可以说通过了对转基因生物进行的任何科学研究未曾经历的最全面的和独立的审查过程。

“The work provides important newknowledge that must be taken into account by the community thatevaluates and reports upon the risks of genetically modifiedorganisms, indeed upon all sources of pesticide in our food andfeed chains. In time these findings must be verified by repetitionor challenged by superior experimentation. In my view, nothingconstructive for risk assessment or promotion of GM biotechnologyhas been achieved by attempting to expunge these data from thepublic record.”

“该项工作提供了重要的新知识，评估和报告转基因生物风险的科学界必须考虑这些知识，因为我们的食品与饲料供应链中存在着所有来源的农药。这些发现必须不断重复验证,或受到更优越的实验的挑战。以我来看，企图从公共记录中删除这些资料，对转基因生物技术的风险评估或其推动没有任何建设性。”

1 2 3 4 567 / 7 页下一页